The server webminal.org runs on a single CentOS Linux box with 8GB RAM. That’s it. No Kubernetes, no microservices, no auto-scaling. One server since 2011.
The website is asking for your email address to access the downloads. We never ask for your email address. Do not enter your data there, it's a phishing attempt.
@dreua @eroc1990 how costly is it to have a registered trademark? I imagine there are other benefits that might make it worth it depending on the cost. Might be the only somewhat reliable way of leveraging official mechanisms to take down copycats and scam attempts
@odnankenobi @dreua @eroc1990 trademarks do not automatically protect anything. The owner is required to pursue legal action to protect the mark. That costs... a LOT of money.
I installed keepassxc yesterday in a hurry, normally I do pay a lot of attention to the URL, in hindsight not so sure... So if I didn't have to enter an email, I should have chosen the right one? Or at least let's say, not this particular one? Is the download malware that leaks the pw datatbase in plain text? Is the signature known to av programs?
@insignificant_nagus I guess you're using M$ Windows (otherwise you would have probably used a package manager). If you still got the .MSI/.zip file, you can check the signature of the file like this: keepassxc.org/verifying-signat… (You can scroll all the way down for a simple hash sum check using PowerShell) If it does match, your installer was legit :) @keepassxc
Of course, there’s no full takedown until the domain is placed on client/server hold. That's correct!
That said, in practice, I rarely see any recovery once Cloudflare puts up a warning page. It’s usually easier for the threat actor to register a new domain.
The good news is that this domain has already propagated across most major AV vendors, and I’ve shared both the domain indicators and the associated malware samples with several partners and information-sharing networks (Quad9, GCA, GSE, etc.). That should help ensure any residual risk is blocked at multiple layers.
I'll set up some monitoring for both this domain and any future attempts to impersonate KeePassXC.
@jeroengui : I very much appreciate your work, but, as a bullet proof proxy service, #CloudflareIsEvil - they're complicit to cybercrime.
Cloudflare warns for malware/phishing for a specific *URL*, not the domain.
A minor change in the adds (or a forwarding site if that is what these scammers use) would bypass Cloudflare's crap measure.
I never saw a malware/phishing warning while opening:
https:⧸⧸keepass-xc.com/index.php
Note: I understand that blocking https:⧸⧸sites.google.com for a single malicious page would be problematic, but that's rather due to the fact that Google Sites sucks.
@ErikvanStraten @jeroengui They forwarded our abuse report to the hoster of the actual page. We’ll see.
Also everyone, if you must visit the page, at least do it in a private window or clear your history afterwards, so you don’t accidentally open it again later!
Jeeze people. Team KeePassXC is trying the best they can. It's absurd to think that a FREE project can just go out and buy $100,000 worth of typo domains. Do a little research into what you're clicking. I for one applaud the effort KeePassXC is making to try and calm it down, but give them a little slack.
@gremlin We already own a lot of variants with different top-level domains and redirect them to keepassxc.org. The only one we couldn't get is .com, because someone snatched it already and has since put it on auction after it was put on block lists. But we cannot also register all possible combinations with hyphens and typos.
We are on the same team. I'm reiterating your point. One "-" and because the user didn't check to be sure the link was right... all the hard work you guys put into these apps goes to immediate waste.
I apprciate this post from you helping users do that for your product.
@gremlin Six different variants with hyphens, kee, key -pw etc. times 10 TLDs times $30 is $1800. But if you want to help, keepassxc[.]com is on auction for a mere $50,000.
@gremlin com is taken, see above. We own net, org, eu, de, us, and some others. Most of these TLDs are $10 the first year and then $15-30 for every following year unless you choose a different registrar for each. app and dev are among the most expensive ones. And then you still have to multiply all those by the number of typosquats you want to catch, which are easily 6-10 for each one.
This entry was edited (Friday, March 27, 2026, 7:41 PM)
Don't worry about that: I'm sure most people would agree with you that doing something like that is overkill for any FOSS project. If you were a per-profit company, sure, but it just makes no sense requiring that from you. Their expectations make absolutely zero sense for me. Donation money should be spent on better things than extra domains.
@gremlin As I said, we already own quite a few different domains. We're a small open source project. We get a healthy amount of donations, but we cannot spend $2000 a year on domains, just so someone can register yet another one we haven't registered yet.
ОФИЦИАЛЬНЫЕ КАНАЛЫ ГРУППЫ the свитер:ВК - https://vk.com/the_sviterТГ - https://t.me/thesviterthe свитер - Музыкальный проект основанный 16 декабря 2014 го...
GrapheneOS started in 2014 and was originally named CopperheadOS. In late 2015, the Copperhead company was founded which was meant to support the project. Copperhead didn't create CopperheadOS and didn't own or control it. Copperhead made a failed takeover attempt on it in 2018.
I think that communities (GrapheneOS and Rossmann) don't have full view of that case and it never received transparent presentation. Even if both attacks each other. IDK if approach you chosen is the best way and I have some doubt's. Maybe the private message to Louis will be more approperiate? Just to solve all issues between both sides without public. Personally I don't like washing dirt's in public. But this is only my humble opinion. We are only people and we all have flaws.
@47be0b2a89faaa66bc57f5c679203486da45660295cb3db3c2f38f4be8d8816e No, both Henry Fisher and Louis Rossmann are engaging in blatant fabrications and spin with the clear goal of harming GrapheneOS and directing harassment towards the founder. Their videos are filled with blatant lies which have been thoroughly disproven. Both do a monologue while showing content not showing what they claim. What proof did they show? They just lie and show stuff not backing up their extraordinary claims.
@wod0bow Rossman engaged in his extraordinarily harmful attacks on GrapheneOS with fabrications, misrepresentations and harassment he deliberately orchestrated from his large number of followers. He did it because a developer who was upset with him private message after months of Rossmann's bullying in private and public which included his support for Techlore's attacks on GrapheneOS which had escalated to repeated swatting attacks from his community. We're open to resolving it with lawsuits.
I understand your approach. Even the legal path. I just don't know if it should be public before the final resolution or even any true actions.
IMHO if you are trying to have good relations with someone you should talk with that particular person and try to solve issues instead of talking about that to the public.
If you are going with legal path than instead talking about that file a lawsuit. And announce that to public.
@RCSM Go ahead. If you want to make your phone far less private and secure, that's your prerogative. You're not paying us anything to use GrapheneOS. If you don't support us when we're being viciously attacked by people trying to destroy the project, what are we losing if you leave?
@47be0b2a89faaa66bc57f5c679203486da45660295cb3db3c2f38f4be8d8816e @wod0bow It's clear you don't believe in it. All it takes is for a couple people to make videos smearing open source developers with fabrications and you're no longer on board with the project or your purported values.
@47be0b2a89faaa66bc57f5c679203486da45660295cb3db3c2f38f4be8d8816e If it doesn't take more than narcissistic YouTuber pushing fabrications and misrepresentations about us to turn you against us then there was little hope of you being on our side to begin with. We're busy wrapping things up with Copperhead and then we'll move on to their lackey Henry Fisher (Techlore). His content is primarily based on their thoroughly debunked lies. It didn't work out for them and it won't work out for him.
@RCSM Your insistence on neglecting active and significant harm is concerning. This apathetic attitude is why people are not held accountable. It cannot just be dropped the same way getting hurt and abused repeatedly cant be dropped. Youre essentially telling victims of abuse and attempted murder to suck it up.
@RCSM This is just petty. Losing one user, out of spite, isnt going to matter. GOS is free to all, and its number of users arent a metric that needs to be increased at all costs. Your spite falls short but it is saddening that you tried to be, regardless. The only consequences are you making your device less private and secure. That is to your detriment, not GOSs.
@47be0b2a89faaa66bc57f5c679203486da45660295cb3db3c2f38f4be8d8816e You linked them in your own post. Nothing in this video is reasonable and that is plain to see. Leaking private DMs to ridicule someone who was being attacked and dealing with the stress that brings is not acceptable. Not to mention how Rossmann lied to his own viewers after that video.
@47be0b2a89faaa66bc57f5c679203486da45660295cb3db3c2f38f4be8d8816e Its not hostility and the pattern of defending themselves would not continue if they stopped being attacked. Numerous examples of proof have been provided. Covering your ears and looking away from it does not make it stop existing.
@wod0bow Concealing abuse, as a victim of it, is not really a good idea.
Last time GOS tried to privately raise the issue and discuss it, they were publicly humiliated and misrepresented. GOS is giving them a chance for forgiveness.
@47be0b2a89faaa66bc57f5c679203486da45660295cb3db3c2f38f4be8d8816e That reflects poorly on you, not positively on them. Your threshold for acceptable evidence is disappointingly low. You seem more interested in fighting for a 'side', even when they lie and abuse others, rather than fighting for whats right. Something about 'weird hill to die on'.
I'm new to grapheneOS and I love your operating system. All you guys do a perfect job. Thank you for that. What I cannot understand is, why you take part of some discussion around your organization and your team. To my opinion, you don't need to do that. You are above this statements and don't need to come down on this stage. To my opinion, this is useless and you reduce your value taking part of useless discussion.
@stoneubi Should we do nothing about the extreme libel, bullying and harassment directed towards our team members? This is happening every day, throughout the day. It takes a huge toll on the project. We could remain silent about it but that's not going to stop or reduce it.
Maybe sounds strange, but yes, you shouldn't. Why? Because the OS you and your team created is unbreakable. So therefore some don't like this fact and therefore they tried to find other ways to leak into your OS. So they found out, that demotivating your team works and maybe leads to the fact, that GrapheneOS gets some damage. So please focus on the positive way. Millions of people use your OS. Right now at these times, we need your OS, you and your team more than every before 👌
This entry was edited (Saturday, March 28, 2026, 3:00 PM)
@smuggler9000 A new system service has been introduced into AOSP that has all permissions possible granted, there is no way to disable its permissions and judging by its logs periodically attempts to access the user's camera without an indicator. When an user asked about it on GrapheneOS's subreddit the post was censored as FUD, when another user asked about it in the OS's official discord server he was told to simply trust the OS and not ask questions.
@draken @[email protected] Not just to you but to each developer and public personality of open source and freedom he harassed well hidden in Canada, and the list is long. And don't forget to use the money of GrapheneOS donation for your personal interests the donators will be happy to see that the donation is not used to develop Graphene but used to finance Micay war against competition (and I am not talking about Google...)
@hristogochev @smuggler9000 the trust me bro approach, for an is who is supposed to be open, and more safe, strange approach. They ban the ones who ask questions as asking a question about Graphene is making you a kiwi farm supporter. Don't ask, just trust is making me thinking to someone
@stoneubi Suggesting apathy in the face of adversity is not ok. It does not work. What is going on is not retaliatory trolling, rather proactive, malicious harm. Meaning GOS is being attacked to kill it off, not to get a reaction out of the team.
This attitude of not holding people accountable is why the world is the way it is. Dont allow wrongs to go unaddressed.
They take part in this kind of discussion the same way a victim wants their abuser to face justice.
@stoneubi It sounds strange because its a horrible thing to say. GOS is not unbreakable but its technical capabilities being impressive dont change the harm that people have caused GOS. What demotivates them is the attacks against them and you are explicitly giving advice that allows this abuse to continue. Do you see the issue there?
Only ~400k people use GrapheneOS at this time, but that will grow, especially with the Motorola partnership. But number of users doesnt make the abuse hurt any less. Many need this OS, as you claim, so you should be far more upset with the abuse it receives and help counter it rather than suggesting apathy as an option.
@stoneubi I hope Daniel listen to you someday (but probably not this week when you look at how violent are this message, even against GrapheneOS users (or probably ex users next week or next months)). GrapheneOS project could someday becoming again a safe place (like it was during CopperheadOS period and a better OS for the users. Make GrapheneOS a respectful ROM.
First of all, I am angered to hear about the bullying. You guys shouldn’t have to contend with that, what you are building to is too important.
There needs to be some other fundamental model for this sort of thing on Nostr. It should be up to us, the supportive community, to protect and defend.
@HybridStaticAnimate I understand what was originally written. But if you are trying to reach someone you usually calling/email them. IDK if they even have mastodon accounts. This is not a effective way to reach them and let them know that you have will of forgiveness. If someone misrepresented the conversation, than instead of whole conversation send short e-mail that you are ready to forgive them, that can't be misrepresented. I just don't like public dirt washing. Nothing else.
There is no violence in these messages. Thats a horrible thing to say. Why are you name dropping one person out of the whole dev team? Why fixate on them?
The GOS userbase is nearing 400k users and growing. Wanting abusers to stop and/or face justice is not going to cause mass amounts of GOS users to leave as you seem to be implying.
GrapheneOS is a safe operating system, and a safe space. All are welcome to join the comunity as long as they are not trolls or criminals. I dont know why voure trying to subtly force the idea it is not a safe place?
Shut up Daniel. Genuinely, shut the fuck up. Everybody is tired of being lied to. We know about your connection to PrivacyGuides. We've all heard the libelous bullshit from you a million times about all of your competitors. I will never use GrapheneOS. I will never recommend GrapheneOS. GrapheneOS is not free software as long as you and your greedy victim-complex mafia control it. You think you're hot shit because you have all of these "privacy" YouTubers glazing you, you've got funding from Proton and from Motorola. But it's meaningless. Real truth-seekers who really care about protecting themselves don't like you because you are a spiteful and extremely manipulative person and your entire team is untrustworthy. I could've almost believed Copperhead was stolen if YOU weren't the one who said it. But every time YOU say something, I have to assume it's a lie. For all I know, you probably stole it. Because your behavior is indicative of someone who needs control over everything, the way you throw a fit at even the mere suggestion that you are not being worshiped, and weasel your way in... Show more...
Shut up Daniel. Genuinely, shut the fuck up. Everybody is tired of being lied to. We know about your connection to PrivacyGuides. We've all heard the libelous bullshit from you a million times about all of your competitors. I will never use GrapheneOS. I will never recommend GrapheneOS. GrapheneOS is not free software as long as you and your greedy victim-complex mafia control it. You think you're hot shit because you have all of these "privacy" YouTubers glazing you, you've got funding from Proton and from Motorola. But it's meaningless. Real truth-seekers who really care about protecting themselves don't like you because you are a spiteful and extremely manipulative person and your entire team is untrustworthy. I could've almost believed Copperhead was stolen if YOU weren't the one who said it. But every time YOU say something, I have to assume it's a lie. For all I know, you probably stole it. Because your behavior is indicative of someone who needs control over everything, the way you throw a fit at even the mere suggestion that you are not being worshiped, and weasel your way into places where you prey on people hoping to find solutions to problems that narcissists like you helped to create to begin with. Fuck you.
@bonkmaykr You're rotting your brain reading endless conspiracy theories and fabricated stories about GrapheneOS and Daniel. You should find a more constructive way to entertain yourself than engaging in harassment towards an open source developer.
You're likely here attacking us because of the harassment started by YouTubers. It's an incredibly strange thing to bring up considering the history of the harassment towards Daniel which is mentioned in this thread. Same goes for Privacy Guides too.
@bonkmaykr Jonah Aragon is the leader of Privacy Guides and was a key part of Techlore when they first started attacking us. He's been participating in the harassment for years. Everyone who was unwilling to support the personal attacks towards Daniel by Jonah left the Privacy Guides project. Every team member of Privacy Guides is banned from GrapheneOS because of the personal attacks they've engaged in for years including endless libelous claims. It kills them to have to recommend GrapheneOS.
@bonkmaykr It's extraordinarily how angry you are towards someone who doesn't know who you are and has never done anything to harm you.
Spending time on 4chan, Kiwi Farms and YouTube consuming harassment content built on fabricated stories and bullying isn't truth-seeking.
You can let us know when you've gotten over the harassment content you've consumed and are ready to stop being unnecessarily hostile towards someone you've never met. Until then, please avoid contacting us. Thanks.
@bonkmaykr What awful behaviour to aim at people. Quite a lot to unpack here despite all the heinous words you have hurled at people you never met.
First, everyone is tired of being lied to, thats probably the only honest/accurate part of this message. Despite this, you lack self awareness in what the lies are and peddle them yourself. You are a hypocrite, whether you know it or not.
The GrapheneOS project accounts are managed by multiple people, yet you have made up this scenario in your head where its one person you dont like. Want to talk about lies? You have substituted your own reality.
GrapheneOS has not made any libelous claims, or defamation, or harassment, or whatever other lie you may try to make up. The evidence is clear but none of what you said is motivated by evidence.
The people who harass GrapheneOS are not competitors. GrapheneOS is not a business, GrapheneOS does not earn profit, and GrapheneOS does not sell products. Your attempt to
... Show more...
@bonkmaykr What awful behaviour to aim at people. Quite a lot to unpack here despite all the heinous words you have hurled at people you never met.
First, everyone is tired of being lied to, thats probably the only honest/accurate part of this message. Despite this, you lack self awareness in what the lies are and peddle them yourself. You are a hypocrite, whether you know it or not.
The GrapheneOS project accounts are managed by multiple people, yet you have made up this scenario in your head where its one person you dont like. Want to talk about lies? You have substituted your own reality.
GrapheneOS has not made any libelous claims, or defamation, or harassment, or whatever other lie you may try to make up. The evidence is clear but none of what you said is motivated by evidence.
The people who harass GrapheneOS are not competitors. GrapheneOS is not a business, GrapheneOS does not earn profit, and GrapheneOS does not sell products. Your attempt to twist this as an underhanded greedy tactic falls short when the abusers can be trivially verified to not be in the same realm as GOS, therefore not competition, and that GOS stands nothing to gain other than not having crimes committed against them.
You not using nor recommending GrapheneOS means nothing. Using GrapheneOS is not a status symbol and you do not gain or lose "privileges" by being a user or not. Again, they are not a business and you have no patronage to deny them.
GrapheneOS is fully open source software, nothing about leadership changes that. Open source is not a badge of honor to bestow or revoke, it is a legal term that you should familiarize yourself with.
None of this is born from ego. No amount of "youtube glazers" could change the reality of the situation.
Real truth seekers dont behave the way you do. Real truth seekers dont cuss victims out on social media because they hate that they are bringing abuse against said victims to light. You arent a truth seeker, you want an echo chamber.
Youre projecting about being spiteful and manipulative, and you have no such evidence to back that claim up.
Everything that follows about disbelief purely on the basis that 'GrapheneOS said it' is pretty self explanatory in how disgusting it is, I dont need to comment on it.
GrapheneOS has never asked for, nor expected worship. GrapheneOS never made any problem. You made this up, "truth seeker". You made all of this up.
Your behaviour is disgusting. Your lies are disgusting. You are part of the problem.
If you really want to run GOS on a compatible device, the current solution would be to sell your Samsung device and then buy a Google Pixel from the 8th, 9th, or 10th generation if you can afford it; if your budget is really too tight, you could consider a used Pixel 8a, which is the entry-level model of the 8th series, making sure it isn’t a carrier-locked model. The Pixel 8a still has 5 years of full security updates plus the current year, it’s worth it.
Otherwise, wait until 2027 for the release of compatible Motorola devices.
@draken I am not surprised he blocks you, he is doing that with everyone who is asking questions he don't like.
I hope a trail will force him to reveal where does the money come from and how he use it because for a non profit, GrapheneOS is a very obscure project and putting the light on it will be interesting and it will be good for the donators to have more transparency (I was one of them a long time ago, and I was ban the first time I ask to have financial transparency)
@draken not at all, there is many other OS you can try, there is /e/OS and IodéOS if you want something already configured and who can work on a massive list of phones after the supplier EoL. There is LineageOS + microG if you are someone who is already breaking your Linux distro every year person and who want to do the things yourself. There is the XDA forum if the Root and the Overclocking is your thing. And there is PostmarketOS and UBtouch if you are more of an experimental guy.
@Xtreix Thank you for the information. Think i will wait and check out whats coming out, like motorola. The EU should ban trackers and allow only cookies for baskets. Its a time to say NO... no more data collectecting!!! Way to unnecessary data is being collected!!!But EU is scared and there is money involved that tips the scale!!
Molto raramente ricevo #sms di #truffa #smishing , stamattina è capitato di ricevere questo tipo di messaggio sms da parte di #nexi , che per me ad oggi era sconosciuta 😂
SMS
NEXI:
E' stata richiesta un autorizzazione di pagamento da €1400,00. Se non sei stato tu contatta il servizio clienti +393452249071
Ovviamente è una truffa , poi.. un azienda non inserisce un numero di cellulare come servizio clienti.
Team KeePassXC
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •Eric
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •Team KeePassXC
in reply to Eric • • •David
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •@eroc1990
Yeah, that sounds like Whac-a-mole.
Anything else that can be done about it?
I just reported it to DuckDuckgo, it is the third result for "keepass xc" there currently -.-
Team KeePassXC
in reply to David • • •Od-Nan Kenobi
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •Might be the only somewhat reliable way of leveraging official mechanisms to take down copycats and scam attempts
Team KeePassXC
in reply to Od-Nan Kenobi • • •Jani Tikkanen
in reply to David • • •Enter lots of fake emails to them? Possibly to domain that tarpits every access or something else that slows down them..
@keepassxc @eroc1990
Kaito
in reply to Eric • • •Insignificant Nagus
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •So if I didn't have to enter an email, I should have chosen the right one? Or at least let's say, not this particular one?
Is the download malware that leaks the pw datatbase in plain text? Is the signature known to av programs?
Linus ⓥ
in reply to Insignificant Nagus • • •I guess you're using M$ Windows (otherwise you would have probably used a package manager).
If you still got the .MSI/.zip file, you can check the signature of the file like this:
keepassxc.org/verifying-signat…
(You can scroll all the way down for a simple hash sum check using PowerShell)
If it does match, your installer was legit :)
@keepassxc
Verifying Signatures – KeePassXC
keepassxc.orgmikeTesteLinuxQlub
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •Szymon Nowicki
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •Team KeePassXC
in reply to Szymon Nowicki • • •Szymon Nowicki
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •tango down.
CloudFlare shows suspected malware.
Paradox
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •from repository
Regendans
in reply to Paradox • • •Jeroen Gui
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •Takedown completed.
If similar sites appear in the future, don’t hesitate to reach out! Always happy to support FOSS projects in protecting their users.
You can also easily report new cases here: justguard.be/report
JustGuard - Cyber Threat Detection & Takedown Solutions
justguard.beTeam KeePassXC
in reply to Jeroen Gui • • •Jeroen Gui
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •Of course, there’s no full takedown until the domain is placed on client/server hold. That's correct!
That said, in practice, I rarely see any recovery once Cloudflare puts up a warning page. It’s usually easier for the threat actor to register a new domain.
The good news is that this domain has already propagated across most major AV vendors, and I’ve shared both the domain indicators and the associated malware samples with several partners and information-sharing networks (Quad9, GCA, GSE, etc.). That should help ensure any residual risk is blocked at multiple layers.
I'll set up some monitoring for both this domain and any future attempts to impersonate KeePassXC.
Erik van Straten
in reply to Jeroen Gui • • •@jeroengui : I very much appreciate your work, but, as a bullet proof proxy service, #CloudflareIsEvil - they're complicit to cybercrime.
Cloudflare warns for malware/phishing for a specific *URL*, not the domain.
A minor change in the adds (or a forwarding site if that is what these scammers use) would bypass Cloudflare's crap measure.
I never saw a malware/phishing warning while opening:
https:⧸⧸keepass-xc.com/index.php
Note: I understand that blocking https:⧸⧸sites.google.com for a single malicious page would be problematic, but that's rather due to the fact that Google Sites sucks.
@keepassxc
#BigTechIsEvil #Malware #Phishing #FakeSites
Team KeePassXC
in reply to Erik van Straten • • •@ErikvanStraten @jeroengui They forwarded our abuse report to the hoster of the actual page. We’ll see.
Also everyone, if you must visit the page, at least do it in a private window or clear your history afterwards, so you don’t accidentally open it again later!
Harvest Malletus
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •Team KeePassXC
Unknown parent • • •Pacman
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •Team KeePassXC
Unknown parent • • •ohir
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •You can take over malicious domain quite easy.
Then you really should take your product to the typo-safe domain name ASAP. Possibly leveraging current publicity.
UDRP process:
icann.org/en/contracted-partie…
John Maxwell
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •TheTearMiser
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •Team KeePassXC
in reply to TheTearMiser • • •TheTearMiser
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •We are on the same team. I'm reiterating your point. One "-" and because the user didn't check to be sure the link was right... all the hard work you guys put into these apps goes to immediate waste.
I apprciate this post from you helping users do that for your product.
Anomaly
in reply to Team KeePassXC • •like this
Team KeePassXC and iam-py-test like this.
iam-py-test reshared this.
Ави Кафазен
Unknown parent • • •@[email protected]Времена идут, но что-то вечно
@[email protected]
Team KeePassXC
Unknown parent • • •Team KeePassXC
Unknown parent • • •Wolfram Rösler
Unknown parent • • •Team KeePassXC
Unknown parent • • •Team KeePassXC
Unknown parent • • •Ashton
Unknown parent • • •The Doctor
Unknown parent • • •Gustavo
Unknown parent • • •Team KeePassXC
Unknown parent • • •Camden
Unknown parent • • •@gremlin Why are you being so authoritative 😅? I get that you're trying to be helpful, but you're coming off very rude. Please be kind.
I agree with the Keepass admin that it probably isn't the best idea to spend all the donation funds on domains.
Raven Luni
in reply to Team KeePassXC • • •Martin G. auf Hubzilla
in reply to Raven Luni • • •@Raven Luni Can you remember and easily type a password with 380 bits of entropy that cannot be cracked using dictionary attacks?
ÝK¾Rî°¡¨òê²|Þ¬-B)º&4ºOmµE$ûÖ×£|@Team KeePassXC
Vovan
in reply to Ави Кафазен • • •youtube.com/watch?v=ueoOBuxMTV…
THE СВИТЕР - СОЦИАЛЬНОЕ ДНО [LIONS HEAD, МОСКВА 2019]
THE СВИТЕР (YouTube)