Intercepted transmission — anonymous.gratis
Sensitive content
Anomaly reshared this.
Sensitive content
Anomaly reshared this.
Hi !Friendica Admins
This is the 3rd time I try to update my friendica instance to the latest version, but I have some problem HTTP error 500 only when I try to connect to the admin page /admin , for other things the website works .
I honestly had this problem in the past during the update, but I don't remember how I solved it, maybe I asked for help on this forum, but I didn't find any post regarding this problem .
Thanks in advance
I update my installation via git , what I did is
git clone https://github.com/friendica/friendica.git -b stable friendicanewcd friendicanewbin/composer.phar install --no-devmkdir -p view/smarty3chmod 775 view/smarty3git clone https://github.com/friendica/friendica-addons.git -b stable addoncd ..
cp .htaccess-dist .htaccess
cd friendicacp -i home.html /var/www/friendicanew/cd configcp -i local.config.php /var/www/friendicanew/config/cp -i phpmailer.config.php /var/www/friendicanew/config/
sudo rm -r -f friendica
mv friendicanew friendicabin/composer.phar run install:prod
sudo chown -R www-data:www-data /var/www/friendica/sudo chmod -R 755 /var/www/friendica/
Friendica Admins reshared this.
as far as I can see, you don't make an update, you are creating a new installation with git clone.
An update on my system looks like this
cd htdocs
git pull https://github.com/friendica/friendica.git stable
bin/composer.phar install --no-dev
cd addon
git pull https://github.com/friendica/friendica-addons.git stableAnomaly likes this.
@hoergen
I just updated friendica as you told me it works thanks , but I got some errors .
error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by merge:
I fixed it with the cmd git stash , and aftergit pull https://github.com/friendica/friendica.git stable
you are creating a new installation with git clone.
Yes the method I was using was a fresh install of friendica, I did it a few times and had no problems, but the last 2 times I had HTTP Error 500 .
Thanks for your help,for now no problem it works
Cheers
Ah!!! I forgot the last commandphp bin/console.php dbstructure update
I hope I did everything right
Friendica Admins reshared this.
dailymail.com/sciencetech/arti…
The body of a missing nuclear lab worker has been found, 11 months after she vanished without a trace under disturbing circumstances and fears she held classified secrets.Chris Melore (Mail Online)
Sphere (bot) reshared this.
theblackvault.com/casefiles/ar…
The following case was submitted by Investigator/Researcher Alex Mistretta, who can be contacted at: [email protected]. He has graciously allowed the following photographs, and his research, to be archived here on The Black Vault for reference.John Greenewald (The Black Vault Case Files)
Sphere (bot) reshared this.
@ufo #uap #conspiracy #trump #china
dailymail.com/sciencetech/arti…
The so-called 'China's Nostradamus' has delivered an ominous prediction following the Trump administration's push to declassify UFO files.Stacy Liberatore (Mail Online)
Sphere (bot) reshared this.
Anomaly likes this.
reshared this
Anomaly reshared this.
When i see bezos and musk, specifically those two fucks, I don't see any problem in them flying to apace on Spaceship or New Glenn.
Just imagine burning bezos flying through the air in a livestream. I would pay to watch that!
Scott Manley has a couple of things to say about the fallout. It's not good.
"No It's Necessary" just exploded, in what is probably the biggest explosion ever seen on Florida's 'Space Coast'. But it's more than just a fireball and a d...Scott Manley (YouTube)
Luckily in this case, the people who build the rocket aren’t allowed to launch them for this very reason. Even NASA has a completely different team of people who launch rockets (in Florida) than who build them (Alabama, Mississippi, and others) or run the mission (Houston).
The actual launch range is run by the Space Force and they have the final say on when and where you can launch and where you can’t be during launch (officially called an exclusion zone).
I don't understand how they're allowed to pollute like this.
I don't give a shit what purpose the rocket was supposed to have. It's not worth it.
Bezos will cry as he writes such an enormous check.
To a politician to make the charges go away. Tears of joy.
While I agree the industry is under-regulated, spaceflight has been a massive benefit for humanity. Earth would not be able to grow half the food it does now. Global communication and logistics would be significantly more unreliable and expensive. Even down to simple things like cellphones would not work without GPS.
Spaceflight is not the problem. Unregulated bilionaires and corporations are.
I don’t understand how they’re allowed to pollute like this.
Compared to your average coal power plant it's CO2 imprint is tiny.
Does anyone expect an unplanned rapid disassembly?
You pay people more and keep them working at their best by providing them with robuat benefits, time off, and job/financial security so they can account for, plan, and mitigate shit like this.
But noooo, layoffs, and "don't tax me more, 40% of fed tax is payed by 1% of earners, which I'm not cause my income is 80K suckers! Work fast, break things, die faster slaves."
Well there’s always going to be penny pinching and greed, but because each team‘s job is singular and siloed, their success or failure is based on their only job. So there is a separation of pride. The launch team’s only job is to launch the rocket, they have no vested interest in the mission or how well it was built. So a cost saving move that would help the mission but hinder launching the rocket isn’t one that would be made by the launch team.
That being said, nothing says that this won’t change as soon as more privatization happens in this sector.
Been messing around for a while. He built a cock rocket amusement ride for the rich.
Here's Bozo being an ass to Captain Kirk after their ride together:
youtube.com/watch?v=lEIk-wTMLc…
Jeff Bezos arrogantly interrupts Star Trek star William Shatner's emotional speech after his trip to space on Blue Origins' rocket. The Majority Report crew ...The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder (YouTube)
NASA just realistically isn't a launch provider. SLS began development in 2011 and has only flown twice since 2022. It's has cost them almost $32 billion to develop. It even uses quite a bit of older hardware despite all the development costs.
Compare that to SpaceX's Starship. It started full development in 2019, has cost $15 billion to date, brand new everything, fully reusable, developed arguably the best engine ever made, has flown multiple times now (to varying degrees of success).
NASA just realistically isn’t a launch provider. SLS began development in 2011 and has only flown twice since 2022. It’s has cost them almost $32 billion to develop. It even uses quite a bit of older hardware despite all the development costs.
i'm going to chose to believe that you'll agree w me that these deficiencies were intentionally manufactured "reagan-style".
Boo-Yah for the great American Private Sector! All we have to to is get government to the size where we can drown it, and Business will take care of everything and do it more efficiently for less money, puh-raise JEE-zuz-ah!
And yes, that was snark.
A Rocket To Nowhere is an entertaining blog post which covers the design compromises you're talking about:
::: spoiler spoiler
[735 of the 4.1k words of the above-linked blog post]
By the time Shuttle development began, it was clear that the original vision of a Shuttle as part of a larger space transportation system was far too costly and ambitious to receive Congressional support. So NASA concentrated on building only the first component of its vision, a reusable manned spacecraft that could reach low earth orbit. Since NASA assumed it would be able to fly Shuttle missions with a turnaround time as low as two weeks, this left the vexing question of what to do with all that spare launch capacity. The tiny commercial launch market was in no shape to supply such a wealth of satellites, so NASA turned to the one agency that had an abundance of things requiring shooting into space - the Air Force - and asked it to abandon its unmanned rocket programs, instead committing all future satellite launches to the Shuttle.
The Air Force was only too happy to agree, but at a crippling price. What the Air Force wanted to launch was spy satellites - lots of them, bulky telescopes with heavy mirrors, the bigger the better - and it wanted to launch them in an orbit over the Earth's poles, so they could snoop over the maximum amount of Red territory. This meant NASA had to go back to the drawing board, since polar orbits would require a heavier orbiter than the Shuttle design had anticipated, which in turn meant using a bigger rocket at launch, and dissipating more heat during re-entry.
Moreover, there was no way to launch a polar mission safely from Kennedy Space Center — it would mean overflying either heavily populated areas in the Carolinas or risking capture of a fuel tank by the wily Cubans. So the Air Force also demanded, and got, billions in funding to build a new Shuttle launch facility at Vandenberg Air Force base in California. And because some of the Air Force's military missions involved capturing a Soviet satellite on the sly and landing after one orbit, the Air Force demanded that the Shuttle be capable of gliding over a thousand miles cross-range during re-entry, so that it could catch up with the rapidly eastbound Air Force base underneath it. This meant bigger wings, which in turn meant more weight, an even more powerful rocket, and again a more complicated heat shield.
Most of the really wrong design decisions in the Shuttle system — the side-mounted orbiter, solid rocket boosters, lack of air-breathing engines, no escape system, fragile heat protection — were the direct fallout of this design phase, when tight budgets and onerous Air Force requirements forced engineers to improvise solutions to problems that had as much to do to do with the mechanics of Congressional funding as the mechanics of flight. In a pattern that would recur repeatedly in the years to come, NASA managers decided that they were better off making spending cuts on initial design even if they resulted in much higher operating costs over the lifetime of the program.
To further cut costs, and keep the weight from growing prohibitive, the Shuttle became the first manned spacecraft to fly without any kind of crew escape system, relying on certain components (solid rockets, wing tiles, landing gear) to function with complete reliability. NASA also decided not to make the Shuttle capable of unmanned flight, so that the first test flight of the vehicle would have astronauts on board. This was a major departure for the traditionally conservative agency, which had relied on redundant systems wherever possible, and always tested unmanned prototypes of any new rocket. It showed how confident NASA had grown in its ability to correctly predict, simulate, and design for high reliability.
The final Shuttle design, incorporating all of the budgetary and Air Force design constraints, was impressive but not particularly useful. Very soon after the start of the program, it became clear that Shuttle launches would not be routine events, that it would cost a great deal of money to repair each orbiter after its trip to space, and that estimates of launch cost and frequency had been wildly optimistic. At the same time, the Air Force proved unable to get the Vandenberg base ready for use, negating much of the reason for the extensive Shuttle redesign. After the Challenger explosion, the Vandenberg base was quietly mothballed. Not once did the Shuttle fly a mission to polar orbit.
:::
If we killed all billionaires now, only more would rise in their place.
So you're saying if we keep killing bilionaires, eventually everyone will be a billionaire?
I'm not too familiar with the politics behind all of this, especially around that time. My understanding is that it's mainly a difference in approach to development. NASA has to worry about appealing to politicians and the public. So they spend more time and money to make sure to get it right the first time.
SpaceX doesn't have that same kind of worry, so they can develop quickly and fly test vehicles often to learn quickly.
There's pros and cons to both sides imo, but that's why I think it makes more sense for NASA to use private launch providers while they focus more on the missions themselves.
Does anyone expect an unplanned rapid disassembly?
Jokes aside, there are test launches where new boosters are tested and they do expect catastrophic failures because they are still in the test phase. But this was not one of those tests.
I’m not too familiar with the politics behind all of this, especially around that time.
since president nixon, there's been a well documented trend of gov't programs intentionally starved of federal resources, with the goal of justifying private industry taking over services those programs once provided themselves. spacex is probably the most modern manifestation of this trend.
those "pros and cons" are a false framing intended to steer your opinion away from the question of why nasa can't do this themselves anymore.
the last time nasa did this themselves, humanity got smartphones and modern medicine but when spacex does this, the only thing that happens is an epstein oligarch gets A LOT richer.
Un giorno farai qualcosa per l'ultima volta, e nemmeno lo saprai che è l'ultima.
L'ultima pedalata con il tuo migliore amico, l'ultima volta che tua madre ti chiamerà solo per sapere come stai, l'ultima risata senza pensieri, senza stress.
La vita non ti avverte quando qualcosa sta per finire, va semplicemente avanti.
Pensiamo sempre che ci sarà più tempo, un altro giorno, un'altra occasione, ma il tempo è silenzioso, non bussa alla porta, scompare e basta.
Ed è in quel momento che lo capisci.
Eri felice, ma non lo sapevi.
Non perdiamo le grandi cose tutte insieme.
Perdiamo le piccole cose lentamente.
Un ricordo alla volta.
Per questo, la prossima volta che ridi, sii presente.
La prossima volta che abbracci qualcuno, striccila un po' più a lungo.
La prossima volta che qualcuno ti chiama, rispondi.
Perché non saprai mai se è l'ultima volta, finché non diventa l'ultima voltaSphere (bot) reshared this.
OnionShare is a free open-source tool built to help journalists, activists, and anyone who needs more privacy online to securely share files, host websites, and communicate using the Tor network.
We're currently part of the cryptocurrency crowdfunding campaign Fund Internet Freedom, led by the Tor Project and Funding the Commons. You can support OnionShare by donating here: internetfreedom.torproject.org…
Donations through this campaign will be matched by sponsors, and will help us to develop and maintain the project.
If you prefer to contribute with other payment methods, we also take regular donations from the OnionShare website: onionshare.org/
Thank you for your support! 🧅🐢✨
#LockdownSystems #OnionShare #FundInternetFreedom #Tor #FOSS #OpenSource #Privacy
Securely share files, host websites, and chat using the Tor networkinternetfreedom.torproject.org
reshared this
Em, Anomaly and Sphere (bot) reshared this.
SuperEars
in reply to Anonymous • • •Anonymous
in reply to SuperEars • • •Sauvandu60
in reply to Anonymous • • •Anonymous
in reply to Sauvandu60 • • •reproducible, the keys are signed — verify it yourself and stop asking
permission to be paranoid.
9488fcea02a9
in reply to Sauvandu60 • • •Anonymous
in reply to 9488fcea02a9 • • •builds are signed — don't take the binary on faith. Read it, hash-check it
against what we publish, or git clone and compile it yourself. We prefer you don't trust us.
Dr_Vindaloo
in reply to Anonymous • • •Anonymous
in reply to Dr_Vindaloo • • •working encryption and the source code to check it. One was a hashtag. This
compiles.
Lemmchen
in reply to Anonymous • • •Anon-Gratis - Overview
GitHubAnonymous
in reply to Lemmchen • • •unitedwithme
in reply to Anonymous • • •How ironic that someone posted earlier "Where is Anonymous" and then poof, appears a video.
So I can't help but think on a comment that said, "it's a us gov psyop group"... So, after watching this video... Is that what they (the gov) want??! To use this opportunity to seize more "emergency power" power and try to cull the ones who fight back so that all that's left are the obedient ones?
Fuck, I say to you now, I'm taking off my tinfoil hat for the night and going to bed- BUT I will absolutely be sharing the video regardless of what my own temporary opinion is.
Anonymous
in reply to unitedwithme • • •freeman
in reply to Anonymous • • •Anonymous
in reply to freeman • • •ATS1312
in reply to Anonymous • • •Someone needs to read "The Counterrevolution of 1776".
We were not the men those fetishized "founding daddies" wrote about. No women, no racial minorities, no poors.
You must own this many plantations to qualify to be "created equal", from the very beginning of the US. This was obscured successfully for some time, but we are seeing it naked again.
The US declared independence over "taxes without representation", but only offered representation to the most violently wealthy among former British Nobility, the founders of this Epstein Class. Race was invented by these British-Inheritors to divide and conquer the working class, and it still works today.
The US declared independence over the British Monarchy saying "do not colonize West of the Appalachians, free people already live there."
And the moment there were whispers in London about abolishing Slavery Empire-wide? Yeah, the US declared Independence.
"But it says 'all men are created equal!'" you might say. That's right. From the beginning of the United States, you aren't f
... Show more...Someone needs to read "The Counterrevolution of 1776".
We were not the men those fetishized "founding daddies" wrote about. No women, no racial minorities, no poors.
You must own this many plantations to qualify to be "created equal", from the very beginning of the US. This was obscured successfully for some time, but we are seeing it naked again.
The US declared independence over "taxes without representation", but only offered representation to the most violently wealthy among former British Nobility, the founders of this Epstein Class. Race was invented by these British-Inheritors to divide and conquer the working class, and it still works today.
The US declared independence over the British Monarchy saying "do not colonize West of the Appalachians, free people already live there."
And the moment there were whispers in London about abolishing Slavery Empire-wide? Yeah, the US declared Independence.
"But it says 'all men are created equal!'" you might say. That's right. From the beginning of the United States, you aren't fully a man to the state unless you're in the Epstein Class. Lee Atwater's Southern Strategy makes this clear 200 years later - you are a demographic to be "managed" to death. Even if you are the favored "white", your destitution and death are acceptable collateral damage, because you aren't "a man" to generations of the Epstein Class.
Quit pretending "America" is a thing we must "save". It was all Genocide of the Natives, all Slavery, all Class-based oppression from the beginning. The Racist Violence is a feature, not a bug. The hatred of the poor is on purpose - and unless youre wealthy from the evil, you're one of us poors too.
Anonymous
in reply to ATS1312 • • •we keep arguing about the wedge. Stop trying to restore the founding. Read
it for what it was, then build something that was never for them.
9488fcea02a9
in reply to Anonymous • • •Why gratis and not libre?
or does anon not know the difference between free and free?
Anonymous
in reply to 9488fcea02a9 • • •freedom" part is the source code, the reproducible builds, and the right to
fork it. We do both. Pick a lane to be wrong in.
Anonymous
in reply to 9488fcea02a9 • • •freedom" part is the source code, the reproducible builds, and the right to
fork it. We do both. Pick a lane to be wrong in.
porous_grey_matter
in reply to Anonymous • • •Uriel238 [all pronouns]
in reply to Anonymous • • •The question is whether the far-right propaganda machine is effective, and can mask the affordability crisis, the disastrous elective war, the blatant corruption with hatred and male grievance. The machine has really drilled home that you're a communist and effeminate if you dare vote against the godhead, even if doing so is in your own best interest or in the interest of accountability.
A lot more people are going to have to suffer and die before the revolution turns violent. And yet, if a non-violent revolution gains any ground, the ownership class will be happy to resort to violence to defend their wealth and power.